Look at who is claiming he was not a CIA operative:
His family claims he was a long time CIA contractor. Certificates and distinctions from what appear to be service all over the globe to prove it. HPD said he did have what appear to be federal credentials of some kind.
"There are credentials in the car that we have seized,” said HPD Capt. Steve Jett. “That was the indication that he worked for the CIA. They look authentic, but you can do a lot of things with a computer." To that end, Houston police said a CIA official would be meeting with investigators to review the identification as well as assist HPD with the case.
Officially, the FBI and CIA say that Carnaby was not an officer. A spokesman for the intelligence agency went as far as to make it a point that while the agency doesn’t normally confirm or deny a person’s employment with the CIA, “he was never a CIA officer.”
Can you really believe what the CIA is claiming? They definitely used this man for something.
Thursday, May 1, 2008
Was Roland Carnaby A CIA Operative?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I think the answer to that is obvious. Why would you compromise over 30 years of intelligence with acknowledging an affiliation? As for the attack on his character, I think that is to be expected. HPD is trying desperately to justify a legit reason for their actions when there isn't one. Both officers who fired were 15 and 22 yr veterans of the force. They knew better. They were angry and probably decided before they even got out of their vehicles how that was going to end. The fact that HPD is saying "He was shaky, he wasn't acting right", says who? The officer? Well of course thats what hes going to say. He just killed a man. I think the truth of the matter is that those officers are truly lucky they are still living and breathing, I have a feeling it could have gone a different route and they could have easily been the one full of bullets. Considering how trigger happy HPD is and always has been, maybe we would have all been better off. He was obviously a trained individual and if memory serves me correctly part of that training is to Flee- and live to fight another day. He knew exactly what he was doing. If there are missing pieces, If there are things that don't make sense and if this man was an enigma, most likely it was supposed to be that way. We as the public are meant to be left confused, and he is most likely meant to be left a question mark.
will be interesting to follow up on this story...
obviously something deeper here...
The focus of this shooting seems to have lost some key points... There a couple of things that seem to be overlooked in the entire incident. First from the video you see an "experienced" officer rush an SUV with very dark tinted windows. Seems to me that sitting back in a stand off (for at least 10 minutes) to talk a possible would be killer out would be the smart thing to do and I doubt they are trained to do what this officer did. I would hate to imagine that oficers would be trained to put himself and his fellow officers at that kind of risk. He should be off the force for that to start with but then he was never fired for any of his other infractions in the past so I guess he thought he was God. He clearly had his body completely at risk of being shot and is beating the window out offering himself no protection from gun shot at all. I do not know about the common man, perhaps he thought he was Superman and bullet proof but the point is it does not appear that this officer or either of those two officers were in fear of being shot down. If you were in fear for your life why would you leave yourself in such an open position to be shot? Unless he thought he was superman and bullet proof he was OBVIOUSLY not in fear for his life. Is there anyone out there who would agree that the officer did not act as though he was in fear of his life with those actions? Additionally, it was not until the window was broken out that the suspect went to get out of the vehicle. At that time the officer on the passenger side window had a clear and full view from less than 3 feet of everything the suspect was doing. At that distance he had the best view and a clear and DISTINCT view of anything the suspect did or picked up. I am not a huge gun person but I can tell the difference between a blackberry from a gun at a distance of 3 feet and in broad daylight. But then that goes back to my first point, this officer was not in fear for his life when he could not see inside the vehicle and was busting out the window but yet when he had clear and distinct view of a man reaching for his cell phone he becomes frightened? How bad is his eye sight anyway? Where was his fear when he left his body wide open?? I would also have to ask is how can you be in fear of your life when the persons back is to you? Remember the suspect was shot in the back. And lastly, in the video when he did shoot the suspect he motioned his hands in a fashion like "ALRIGHT -WE GOT HIM". Is that where we are now??? It is a score to shoot an unarmed man in his back now lets celebrate??? So in fear for his life but rushes the window and begins beating it out... Yes it certainly looked like those two officers were very much in fear of their lives. I always run up on cars when I think somone is going to shoot me. Doesn't everybody???? Something is VERY wrong with this whole thing.
Would have been nice if they would have used good proceedure and the supsect could have had his day in court. Now no one will nkow but maybe that is how HPD wanted it.
Post a Comment